Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 16:17:38 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FrameRelay support for cx/ctau adapters Message-ID: <20040507121738.GA97302@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040507160253.B61288@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20040507160253.B61288@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 04:08:52PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: D> we're using Cronyx adapters, some of them in FremaRelay mode, which has been D> supported by cronyx-made drivers available from vendor site for most of FreeBSD D> versions. FR support involves modifications to sppp kernel routines. D> D> Main driver maintainer is now FreeBSD committer (rik@). D> However, during merging cx/ctau into the tree, FR suppport has not been D> incorporated. Roman told me there are some objections to these modifications. D> D> Can I ask for more complete cx/ctau support including FR? D> D> Please keep me CC'd, as I'm not subscribed to -net. FreeBSD has support for FR with help of nodes ng_frame_relay and ng_lmi. This support is hardware independent. And it works perfectly with cronyx adapters. What is a reason for merging hardware specific support from old cronyx driver into base system? P.S. I'll try to translate cronyx docs into english this weekend, and submit them as a manpage. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040507121738.GA97302>