From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 30 18:16:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767AB900 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:16:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Received: from duck.symmetricom.us (duck.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477C8D36 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (daffy.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.218]) by duck.symmetricom.us (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r0UIFx0R093745 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:15:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r0UIFvuG024012; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:15:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: DockStar status? From: Ian Lepore To: Brett Wynkoop In-Reply-To: <20130130130342.082ddf42@ivory.lan> References: <20130128205038.0e4eb52ba9c06c4de22f8cef@getmail.no> <1359555447.93359.230.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20130130111634.5d248443@ivory.lan> <1359568047.93359.256.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20130130130342.082ddf42@ivory.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:15:56 -0700 Message-ID: <1359569756.93359.260.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:16:00 -0000 On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 13:03 -0500, Brett Wynkoop wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:47:27 -0700 > Ian Lepore wrote: > > > Nothing designed for consumers / end-users. We make precision timing > > gear that shows up in server rooms at ISPs, in cell towers, flying on > > satellites, in the metrology laboratories of various nations, that > > sort of thing. If you need a stable time source that drifts no more > > than a few nanoseconds within a 24 hour period, or need to serve > > hundreds of thousands of NTP and PTP packets per second, we've got > > you covered. > > > > Clock-in-a-box! Way cool. Do some of these devices have wwvb or gps > receivers? > > In the past I have been tasked with getting clock sources for clients, > and you never know when that might be the case again. > > -Brett > They virtually all have gps/gnss receivers. A few of them are at the other end of that pipeline -- they have an ensemble of atomic clocks and act as the ground stations generating the timing signals that eventually propagate over RF. -- Ian