Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 20:21:54 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com>, mb@imp.ch, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PATCH: wchar_t is already defined in libstd++ Message-ID: <20020617202154.B20621@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200206172216.g5HMGjrS022873@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@lcs.mit.edu on Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 06:16:45PM -0400 References: <20020617235725.F60170-100000@levais.imp.ch> <200206172202.g5HM2HW52939@lakes.dignus.com> <200206172216.g5HMGjrS022873@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 06:16:45PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Mon, 17 Jun 2002 18:02:17 -0400 (EDT), Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> said: > > > The correct approach (and, I have to admit to not > > glancing at your patch) would be: > > > #ifndef __cplusplus > > typedef _BSD_WCHAR_T_ wchar_t > > #endif > > Actually, the correct approach would be to avoid defining > _BSD_WCHAR_T_ when compiling C++. This way, it only needs to be done I am much more likely to force the libstdc++ build to use our _BSD_WCHAR_T_. Our types should be centralized and not in some hidden vendor software that often makes wrong assumptions about us. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020617202154.B20621>