From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Dec 20 14:32:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5088F37B405; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 14:32:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from contactdish ([10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id fBKMWcR30073; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 23:32:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <026b01c189a6$3bb4b6c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "John Baldwin" Cc: , "Gilbert Gong" , "Jeremiah Gowdy" References: Subject: Re: Microsoft Advocacy? Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 23:32:39 +0100 Organization: Anthony's Home Page (development site) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John writes: > Some said (rough paraphrase): > > FreeBSD is suitable for use as a desktop for > specific circumstances. > > This is equivalent to: > > FreeBSD is suitable for use as a desktop for > at least one circumstance. > > Jeremiah replied with: > > "I do not agree." > > Which is equivalent to: > > FreeBSD is not suitable for use as a desktop > for at least one circumstance. > > Which is equivalent to: > > FreeBSD is not suitable for use as a desktop > for any circumstance. Your logic is flawed. Your last two conclusions do not follow from the first three statements. Consider this: SomeoneBelieves = OSFree && Suitability && Desktop && Specific; JeremiahBelieves = !(OSType && Suitability && Desktop && Specific); Some Jere OSFree Suitability Desktop Specific true false true true true true false true true true true false false true true true false true [...] false true false false false false Notice that there are multiple values of each variable that would make JeremiahBelieves true, and not just one. Therefore you cannot conclude that one of the variables (Specific = specific circumstances, as opposed to any circumstances) has necessarily changed state to make JeremiahBelieves true; any one of the variables changing to false will make JeremiahBelieves true. Therefore your conclusion above does not follow logically. Now I'm getting worried about spin mutexes and locks. Are you completely sure about those? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message