Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 13:31:58 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Aleksander Rozman - Andy <andy@kksonline.com> Cc: "FreeBSD Questions @ FreeBSD.org" <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: BSD Version Message-ID: <20020113133158.B17636@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20020113132649.0282d488@sundance.kks.net>; from andy@kksonline.com on Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 01:31:14PM %2B0100 References: <00bb01c198fa$2c426800$9d56579d@india.ti.com> <5.0.2.1.0.20020113132649.0282d488@sundance.kks.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--neYutvxvOLaeuPCA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 01:31:14PM +0100, Aleksander Rozman - Andy wrote: > Hi ! >=20 > I started working on some things (implementing some kernel stuff) and I= =20 > wanted to upgrade my system to latest version. Since my building of curre= nt=20 > failed, I wanted to upgrade from SNAP server, but there are several=20 > 5-0xxxxxx-CURENT versions. When I cvsup with tag=3D., do I get 5.0-Curren= t=20 > version or latest of 4.x?? You get the "head of the CVS tree", which is the current development version, currently known as 5.0-CURRENT. > Which is the best way to install FreeBSD-Current? Well, a snapshot install would be fine if you're having build problems. Kris --neYutvxvOLaeuPCA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8QfzOWry0BWjoQKURAm3FAKCeDePbjo95foeQPR35HQ3dSZlliQCeOowQ 4vsgAMIBnw5BgwNG4lUh9S4= =j4LE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --neYutvxvOLaeuPCA-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020113133158.B17636>