Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 10:14:51 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Patrick Thomas <root@utility.clubscholarship.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC on my SHM tunings for multiple jailed postgres... Message-ID: <20020503171451.GJ36741@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20020503071536.G86733-100000@utility.clubscholarship.com> References: <20020503082731.GI36741@elvis.mu.org> <20020503071536.G86733-100000@utility.clubscholarship.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Patrick Thomas <root@utility.clubscholarship.com> [020503 07:19] wrote: > > So kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 will give me more flexibility, but will slow > down performance (vs. using kernel memory) ? It will not cause any problems unless you don't have enough memory. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020503171451.GJ36741>