From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 7 07:37:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03B816A418 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:37:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5650713C455 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:37:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so11192576fka.11 for ; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:37:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=pygMxd8G6bNb90Gqfq4wgZiRPDVC4NkqhUKs2/XqPH8=; b=QUQyHyTov+6XzXe1Ikji5TTaxOE8iFanJr1T3Spclqak1a31lOEu9xEj9oGoiJA/UZ7wPdwydEaA2YzVE28Sl7vbC7PhXEeis8sLdo2+mNlLib8vK3Pi7mnbjp8/hlzQ+APjYQ7BGq0FLxaYOPlm59NKpL1yUHmERxYSwvISRJY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=adXbJHRKx9xNtY/k49iE6IV5/ZJXynQV3FQ5jrVWy3hmjYKLMD5TO5wuO+ryChHK3BI3UyaUBKomvKcMkW6l0hPaEW1oO8PVr5XiMjAQZ7hY7cPyf+KqtmhvhC+vpY4nDxGEz0i8vF/dULnUSrBjHUPbcts0eOL9SF4DH/yNq3M= Received: by 10.82.106.14 with SMTP id e14mr27364197buc.38.1199689812107; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:10:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.159.19 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 23:10:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <14989d6e0801062310q6992630et93370d5d2d0be2c7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:10:12 +0100 From: "Christian Walther" To: "Maxim Sobolev" In-Reply-To: <47814EAB.70405@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4780D289.7020509@FreeBSD.org> <4780E546.9050303@FreeBSD.org> <9bbcef730801060651y489f1f9bw269d0968407dd8fb@mail.gmail.com> <4780EF09.4090908@FreeBSD.org> <47810BE3.4080601@FreeBSD.org> <4781227B.5020800@rcn.com> <47814EAB.70405@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should we simply disallow ZFS on FreeBSD/i386? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 07:37:43 -0000 Hi Maxim, On 06/01/2008, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Gary Corcoran wrote: > > Perhaps the 7.0 release notes should include a note to the effect that > > ZFS is *strongly* NOT RECOMMENDED on 32-bit systems at this time, due > [...] The only place where FreeBSD/i386 beats FreeBSD/amd64 is > desktop, due to binary drivers and such, but ZFS is almost useless > there. I don't think so. My guess is that partitioning/slicing disks is a pain for most of the users. How does one tell how big a filesystem should be, even or especially on the desktop? I found myself having to cope with full filesystems several times. Using ZFS even on one disk just to get rid of fixed partition/slice boundaries is a good thing. Christian