From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 28 11:35:30 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0293E16A41C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:35:30 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au)
Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630D143D1D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:35:28 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au)
Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5SBZQif028671;
	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:05:26 +0930 (CST)
	(envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au)
From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:05:13 +0930
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
References: <1dbad315050621051525f4c6fc@mail.gmail.com>
	<200506281904.48464.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
	<20050628111332.GC48140@isis.sigpipe.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20050628111332.GC48140@isis.sigpipe.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8116661.EzeYXz61JX";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200506282105.20586.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 () ALL_TRUSTED
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 203.31.81.10
Cc: Michael Schuh <michael.schuh@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:35:30 -0000

--nextPart8116661.EzeYXz61JX
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:43, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # doconnor@gsoft.com.au / 2005-06-28 19:04:18 +0930:
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:51, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > >     No you don't. You want to make a side-by-side comparison
> > >     of two products, and if one of them underperforms, it just
> > >     underperforms. You cannot use a poor location selection
> > >     strategy in the driver as an excuse for poor operation.
> >
> > dd is a useful start, but you shouldn't read too much into the results
> > since, in general, dd doesn't reflect real world usage patterns.
>
>     Huh? Various people have reacted to the "dd doesn't reflect real
>     world" with "but I *do* use dd in real world".

Read what I said..

"... IN GENERAL ..."

=2D-=20
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C

--nextPart8116661.EzeYXz61JX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCwTX45ZPcIHs/zowRAtioAKCTo1pK2gYMHrsUFM9dAhqswjAbYACfYxq1
vdsO133HpX49mgmRAxj8lNw=
=It3f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart8116661.EzeYXz61JX--