From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 16:46:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFB61065698 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2986F8FC0C for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so3512800vws.13 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:46:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z9uakOPaFPBigedmM8JkFVSxFx4YVI/8gIijvwf9cf0=; b=CTNaL4nzd9MIJLyZeEAE1HrAQ9jvanRBtJZlW8rggnscA4Xp525DHM6lHE8rTQWAmQ zntvtndZ0IeNv41GRhGJb80ehaCZ0k3qTN9SQ1MIBY75a2Dk+qxsUG1jGMAgTeZtdNKq 3kieTFUpqgSeTET0O+zWceYCPDATgCQx2qx3Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=M6uR4AUUlQqQkYfMyWQr7OC+feWZFML2cjlmh1eB4lpHugPwEZenQFijyaciJGMjvJ 0O24jRfa2lx/GWq/2LGUpRebnQ+jmxl5rFS6G4vea+lIQJbY/GaEMXG2qi7aVPyEvmMF vRkkpdbmI3UpM6t7y0eoqRy1UG4xPOq4Zcfxg= Received: by 10.220.124.224 with SMTP id v32mr688347vcr.4.1282927612275; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schism.local (173-161-130-225-Philadelphia.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.161.130.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u29sm1715696vcr.1.2010.08.27.09.46.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C77EBF8.9020405@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:46:48 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Jaeger References: <4C77DB15.5010501@gmail.com> <20100827163310.GD67795@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20100827163310.GD67795@home.opsec.eu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security/clamav: Segmentation fault when running clamav in a 32-bit jail on a 64-bit host X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:46:54 -0000 On 8/27/10 12:33 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> I have a few clamav instances running in jails on 32-bit hosts without >> any issues. A few days ago one of these jails was migrated to a 64-bit >> host (8.1-RELEASE), where I noticed clamd (0.96.2_1) segfaults when queried. >> >> The issue seems specific to 32bit/64bit compatibility. I have a gdb >> session available here: http://gist.github.com/549964 >> >> Any thoughts on if this is possible? > > Try > > Bytecode no > > in clamd.conf ? > It was set to 'yes' initially. I thought it was disabled with building without JIT. At any rate, no, it still segfaults with the same backtrace. Regards, -- Glen Barber