Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 00:19:35 +0200 From: Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org>, Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org>, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua Subject: Re: wine-1.1.8 regression -- wine: could not load L"...": Invalid address Message-ID: <20081130221935.GA79764@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 06:58:14PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Alex Kozlov wrote: >>> The patch moves this to (address_space_limit - 10 * VIRTUAL_HEAP_SIZE). >>> I'm not sure that's correct. I think simply 0x80000000 would be better, >>> but that's what Alexandre can tell you. >> I'm also not sure. That why this patch quick and dirty. Let see what >> Julliard has to say. >From Alexandre POV most correct action will be to fix reserve_areas logic on FreeBSD. (I try that on this weekend, but with limited success. Very limited. Need more work, and I'm not sure that I will have enough time) As for the patch, place when alloc virtual_heap don't matter. So I think 0x80000000 is ok. > Thanks again, Alex, and thanks for the review, Tijl! (I had the same > question on the second hunk. ;-) This is garbage from my attempts to fix reserve_area. Sorry. -- Adios
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081130221935.GA79764>