Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:25:24 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> To: Garance A Drosehn <gad@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org, Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz>, "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> Subject: Re: Bug in #! processing - "pear broken on current" Message-ID: <20050613102524.GE30017@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <p06210262becf30ca925d@[128.113.24.47]> References: <200506090027.j590R2t0070899@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050609003619.GA10578@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050609100815.GB16677@over-yonder.net> <p06210258bece1422da20@[128.113.24.47]> <20050609160316.GC16677@over-yonder.net> <p06210259bece1ae26f44@[128.113.24.47]> <20050610062431.GA78875@isis.sigpipe.cz> <AB853771-D3D6-4F2A-A863-FDB5EA89563A@xbsd.org> <20050610104829.GA80719@isis.sigpipe.cz> <p06210262becf30ca925d@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Garance, > However, I do agree that the previous behavior could be very useful > in other situations. I will soon have a version of `env' which will > provide all the benefits that used to happen due to the previous > parsing behavior. In fact, it will be even more flexible and support > even more options than the previous parsing behavior did. And I think > I can even define it in such a way that other operating systems could > pick up these changes to `env' (if they wanted to), and enjoy the same > flexibility. And more important to me, I could recompile this new > `env' on other operating systems, and at least *I* would have those > benefits on all platforms I work on! I'm surely too much impatient, but what are those powerful features ? :) Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050613102524.GE30017>