Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 06:31:22 +0530 From: ashish@FreeBSD.org (Ashish SHUKLA) To: Matthieu Volat <mazhe@alkumuna.eu> Cc: ashish@FreeBSD.org (Ashish SHUKLA), ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.01 Message-ID: <864mcs1g9p.fsf@chateau.d.if> In-Reply-To: <20160228193353.0b62c06b@freedom.alkumuna.eu> (Matthieu Volat's message of "Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:33:53 %2B0100") References: <86h9gs26l0.fsf@chateau.d.if> <20160228193353.0b62c06b@freedom.alkumuna.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:33:53 +0100, Matthieu Volat <mazhe@alkumuna.eu> said: | On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 21:02:59 +0530 | ashish@FreeBSD.org (Ashish SHUKLA) wrote: [..] | Thanks for your work, Thank you for taking time to test the diff. | On my 10.2/amd64 host, the build failed due to using <stdint.h> types wit= hout including it in : | /usr/ports/net-im/ejabberd/work/deps/p1_stringprep/c_src/stringprep.cpp Following changeset from the diff file should fix this: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- diff -urN /usr/ports/net-im/ejabberd/files/patch-.._deps_p1__stringprep_c__= src_stringprep.cpp ejabberd/files/patch-.._deps_p1__stringprep_c__src_strin= gprep.cpp =2D-- /usr/ports/net-im/ejabberd/files/patch-.._deps_p1__stringprep_c__src_= stringprep.cpp 1970-01-01 05:30:00.000000000 +0530 +++ ejabberd/files/patch-.._deps_p1__stringprep_c__src_stringprep.cpp 2016-= 02-28 20:11:00.521409079 +0530 @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +--- ../deps/p1_stringprep/c_src/stringprep.cpp.orig ++++ ../deps/p1_stringprep/c_src/stringprep.cpp +@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ + */ +=20 + #include <string.h> ++#include <libutil.h> + #include <erl_nif.h> +=20 + #include "uni_data.c" =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Are you sure, the diff was not properly applied. I tried the diff from the URL, and applied on net-im/ejabberd and seems to have applied fine, and it builds fine too, on 10.2-RELEASE/amd64 | And it seems the pam module is not installed, again? | chmod: /usr/local/lib/erlang/lib/ejabberd-16.01/priv/bin/epam: No such fi= le or directory | chown: /usr/local/lib/erlang/lib/ejabberd-16.01/priv/bin/epam: No such | file or directory This is an oversight on my part. Sorry about this. I have updated the diff = to refer to the correct path. https://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/diffs/ejabberd-16.01-01.diff sha256 sum: 7dd1f02da1ccf035f58d857a710787bdc6080d2e2651ca1dd9d1a335a3cc57c8 If you could functionally test PAM support as well, that'll be great. Thanks! =2D-=20 Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 Sent from my Emacs --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJW05hjAAoJEMdGz6nnT6SwQQoP/Rb0zzvsUgQ462WBI7WEhwpx SueUM8sDgXo5FcoHNxJkKJ5BqEpOF1ObHlVFA0lLt/JqH9h2BZbJ57zDhZ9x2HQQ Bx6qZlgYmy1KJYEkRh02ZeJrqEQW0GtOQWrfmL3/CYd/8oa53LVyrtA0rJYYNgPj G8B8G6PezJ22ok0TUC/Ju87KSwn5EeSPZgqHTOCUsz1G3/gYVBM7pjJhv8XXHazy 3QV2zDgLFVGdyPIL/lcBcjDbeULVBI4aNpe8SwJVMdaCgbeq72A094v4ZbgRXXe0 SracX8T+3FPwZvcgJH3D6j2ed1x+bAcS/RJ8aPRA8ysnw5p8QVIiFGgQ/WKNjrfr dLKPzHHcI1F69HjsMZTIKVnckKnhdFax/jIt7CpsamYFOifaYcmqcgGdlhzCSdQR Luyc+7Mllh8NNbkuh8i/VHw1Zny5Bgj/vr4lcJDxmUIwcDl22TZo30lMrph4QHo0 SV9Z3ccCpD336TDmQPYzbo80EfN92RaLhOjSLmyouZpt9sNIeSW3fADk6PAiukm6 lbzpKVJ7ozHW4rxuuXQFJC/JfNtPnsM4lMCNOT+A2RGhYZHXctxHtPKTRTlGXpmU hH44wKSUALYhUunqOruMZPtd+rwzYO3dMzVcKCX/ppjT6IN7bqautNxTH0L+it0O +XN1fMx8yY98CqzRxMVX =q4zc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?864mcs1g9p.fsf>