Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 14:01:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: NO Bogus errno twiddling by lstat... Message-ID: <199806211801.OAA11846@rtfm.ziplink.net> In-Reply-To: <199806202002.NAA17957@usr02.primenet.com> from "Terry Lambert" at "Jun 20, 98 08:02:49 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert once stated: => If, however, you don't like our malloc's current implementation, and => think that errno should be saved and restored across a successful => call, and that the lost cycles would be worthwhile, then diffs would => be perfectly welcome, I'm sure. Please, excuse the raising of my tail and entering into this discussion, but at least the subject deserves changing. It would appear, several people pointed out that there is no "bogus errno twiddling by lstat". And the original poster _implicitly_ acknowledged that and the thread is now discussing something totally different. We are yet to see an _explicit_ acknowledgment, though... Sorry for throwing this, but this sort of subject really will look bad in the archives of my favorite OS, something it does not deserve, at least in this case. "Oh yeah, see, they had problems in their lstat-implementation back in 1998". -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806211801.OAA11846>