From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 28 22:25:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7213716A513 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D42843CF7 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:24:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2006 22:24:37 -0000 Received: from p509110FC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO m2a2.dyndns.org) [80.145.16.252] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 28 Nov 2006 23:24:37 +0100 X-Authenticated: #428038 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6492007BE; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:24:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (m2a2.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01475-10; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:24:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 69E1A201C9A; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:24:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:24:36 +0100 From: Matthias Andree To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <20061128222436.GA2035@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Schmehl , FreeBSD Ports References: <9346780FF79C46C73668FD49@utd59514.utdallas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://home.pages.de/~mandree/keys/GPGKEY.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-11-21) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at emma.line.org X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: All Berkeley db's downloads broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:25:38 -0000 On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Tuesday, November 28, 2006 22:34:39 +0100 Matthias Andree > wrote: > >DIST_SUBDIR has nothing to do with the upstream download location, but > >determines where the files are put locally when they are being > >downloaded (and obviously, where the ports system will try to extract > >the tarballs and read the patches from). > Groan - I knew that. Don't know what I was thinking there.... Nevermind, I should have notices this earlier, too... > But the checksums had changed, right? No, you only changed the paths, sorry. :-) -- Matthias Andree