Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:16:30 -0600 From: "Brad Davis" <brd@FreeBSD.org> To: "Tom Rhodes" <trhodes@freebsd.org> Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: network-dns Message-ID: <35ffa5710808251916w439fc08fxc72870aed2372bf5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080825190946.25342442.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <896438678.20080825194024@xablo.com> <20080825190946.25342442.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Tom Rhodes <trhodes@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:40:24 -0300 > franco@xablo.com wrote: > >> Hi, on freebsd 7, the dns setted up on this page will not work >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/network-dns.html >> >> because there is needed to comment a default line which does not >> allow foreign querys (only allow localhost at 127.0.0.1) >> >> Also, the ftp configuration there >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/network-ftp.html >> >> is not working on freebsd 7. following the steps you will never get >> connected at >> >> % ftp localhost >> >> Let me know. > > It would be neat if we could have some kind of implemented > "known handbook issues" which is completely separate from the > various PR listings in gnats. I'm sure that some data > easily becomes stale, and there are probably sections which > require written still. > > But now I'm probably bleeding into more of an unreasonable > area since we could probably just grep through the doc PRs > and find some of the stale data listed. I was just thinking we should put a chart on the wiki with all the different sections and date/name. So we could have committers/volunteers can say I have gone through section X and verified the directions are valid against $LATEST_RELEASE_X and $LATEST_RELEASE_Y. Anyone think there would be any validity to setting this up? Regards, Brad Davis
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35ffa5710808251916w439fc08fxc72870aed2372bf5>