Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:54:24 -0700 From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program Message-ID: <20121026195424.8AE4858094@chaos.jnpr.net> In-Reply-To: <CAGH67wS54AA3C%2B1D99dqBqKy-K1G5MVN0DERbaYbFsfCMmqHbA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGH67wRkOmy7rWLkxXnT2155PuSQpwOMyu7dTAKeO1WW2dju7g@mail.gmail.com> <CDA41F27-73C1-47CF-B84D-2627B1F7E7D8@xcllnt.net> <20121001223100.E7D0D58093@chaos.jnpr.net> <FDE5A28C-297A-4476-B06E-638049E20C6C@gmail.com> <20121002000030.54CEE58093@chaos.jnpr.net> <CAGH67wSaFeVyr_uNfigNQ%2BOBy4JmiLMa_u7c7=aqgB7wDKzsLg@mail.gmail.com> <20121026165414.GA43599@dragon.NUXI.org> <CAGH67wS54AA3C%2B1D99dqBqKy-K1G5MVN0DERbaYbFsfCMmqHbA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:27:35 -0700, Garrett Cooper writes: >There are some basic examples, but they're in my p4 branch and >unfortunately they depend on atf.test.mk/bsd.test.mk/bsd.progs.mk Speaking of which. I notice there is now a bsd.progs.mk in head, which bears little relationship to the one I was talking about (from devel/bmake). Is this bsd.progs.mk essentially your port of netbsd's bsd.prog.mk it seems much more complex than should be necessary (my progs.mk is 75 lines vs 350 for the one in head). Would you be awfully upset if I replace it with the simpler one?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121026195424.8AE4858094>