From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Jul  7 15:50:58 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CC7041549F; Wed,  7 Jul 1999 15:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from root@implode.root.com)
Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA23598;
	Wed, 7 Jul 1999 15:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199907072249.PAA23598@implode.root.com>
To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Heh heh, humorous lockup 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 07 Jul 1999 11:43:44 PDT."
             <199907071843.LAA92954@apollo.backplane.com> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 15:49:39 -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>    Since we have increased the hard page table allocation for the kernel to
>    1G (?) we should be able to safely increase VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX.  I was
>    thinking of increasing it to 512MB.  This increase only effects 
>    large-memory systems.  It keeps them from locking up :-)
>
>    Anyone have any objections?

   Yes, I do - at least with the 512MB figure. That would be half of the 1GB
KVA space and large systems really need that space for things like network
buffers and other map regions.

-DG

David Greenman
Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org
Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message