From owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Mon Feb 22 09:28:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D091AAFDF0 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:28:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@tomster.org) Received: from smtp.cachexia.de (smtp.cachexia.de [46.101.204.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEB401344 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@tomster.org) Received: (qmail 52100 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2016 09:28:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smiley-3.fritz.box) (tom@tomster.org@77.180.194.85) by smtp.cachexia.de with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 22 Feb 2016 09:28:08 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: Jail management From: Tom Lazar In-Reply-To: <7b947a1c-824b-193d-3dc3-49d876b21be9@ish.com.au> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:28:07 +0100 Cc: markham breitbach , freebsd-jail Message-Id: <13A9C47A-86FE-4E44-83D6-4736488FB9CC@tomster.org> References: <7b947a1c-824b-193d-3dc3-49d876b21be9@ish.com.au> To: Aristedes Maniatis X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:28:19 -0000 > On 22 Feb 2016, at 09:17, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: >=20 > Markham wrote: >=20 > I also discovered iocage which looks quite different and interesting. = I'm still reading about it, but it seems to: another thing you might want to take a look at - given your requirements = and current setup - is jetpack[1] it basically implements the docker approach using zfs and jails as = underlying technology and pretty much replaces (the unstable) solution = of unionfs with its layers based on zfs snapshots. while it seems to be the least mature option discussed in this thread so = far, i think its container approach fills a niche that might fit your = use case very well. having said that, i=92d like to point out, that florian and myself (the = authors of bsdploy) are very open to using saltstack - bsdploy is = designed to be modular and we already have experimental support for it = [2] and the GPL licence of ansible is turning into a bigger annoyance = than expected[3] so we are motivated to continue along that path. just my two cents, cheers, tom =20 [1] https://github.com/3ofcoins/jetpack [2] https://github.com/ployground/ploy_salt = [3] https://github.com/ployground/bsdploy/issues/75=