Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:42:56 -0700
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Cc:        "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>, Kurt Lidl <lidl@pix.net>
Subject:   Re: Missing "Local system status"
Message-ID:  <1579252.MOChMlxT6g@ralph.baldwin.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20150915175222.GG1709@over-yonder.net>
References:  <20150915080318.GA89697@server.rulingia.com> <55F811F1.7040202@pix.net> <20150915175222.GG1709@over-yonder.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 12:52:22 PM Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:41:21AM -0400 I heard the voice of
> Kurt Lidl, and lo! it spake thus:
> > 
> > So the real argument ought to be if rwhod/ruptime ought to be part of a
> > different MK_xxx,
> 
> I think Peter's point is that 430.status-rwho shows uptime(1) info
> too, if rwhod isn't writing out data for it to ruptime(1), so it's
> still useful even without r*.  Which also means it's slightly
> misnamed, but...

Humm.  I'm inclined to just always install it.   Having a second
script would just duplicate code (and then having rwho in the name
would be confusing).

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1579252.MOChMlxT6g>