From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Fri Oct 30 18:25:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E17A22BFC for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 18:25:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 050331B1E for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 18:25:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19D08B915; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:25:24 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" , Kurt Lidl Subject: Re: Missing "Local system status" Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:42:56 -0700 Message-ID: <1579252.MOChMlxT6g@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.2-STABLE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20150915175222.GG1709@over-yonder.net> References: <20150915080318.GA89697@server.rulingia.com> <55F811F1.7040202@pix.net> <20150915175222.GG1709@over-yonder.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:25:24 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 18:25:25 -0000 On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 12:52:22 PM Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:41:21AM -0400 I heard the voice of > Kurt Lidl, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > So the real argument ought to be if rwhod/ruptime ought to be part of a > > different MK_xxx, > > I think Peter's point is that 430.status-rwho shows uptime(1) info > too, if rwhod isn't writing out data for it to ruptime(1), so it's > still useful even without r*. Which also means it's slightly > misnamed, but... Humm. I'm inclined to just always install it. Having a second script would just duplicate code (and then having rwho in the name would be confusing). -- John Baldwin