Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Jul 2002 07:44:28 -0400 (EDT)
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        obrien@freebsd.org
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.cpu.mk
Message-ID:  <XFMail.20020728074428.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020727204350.A74830@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 28-Jul-2002 David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 06:30:59PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >   Revision  Changes    Path
>> >   1.14      +10 -12    src/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk
>> 
>> I'm currently testing some further changes that define NO_CPU_CFLAGS for
>> BMAKE, TMAKE, and XMAKE to handle bootstrapping issues and use
> 
> My guess is because GCC 3.1 handles more types than GCC 2.93.  Please
> make the use of NO_CPU_CFLAGS conditional on either __FreeBSD_cc_version
> or _FreeBSD_version.

Yes.

> All new bootstrapping warts should have an "expire date".

Here's the thing, this is just for building throw-away tools, why go
to the extra effort to optimize temporary binaries?  As long as the
final binaries built by buildworld are right that's what really matters.
Is it really worth the extra effort to try and get this right?

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020728074428.jhb>