From owner-freebsd-alpha Fri Mar 26 7: 1:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from calis.blacksun.org (Calis.blacksun.org [168.100.186.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A1B15044 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 07:01:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from don@calis.blacksun.org) Received: from localhost (don@localhost) by calis.blacksun.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA59009; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 10:03:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from don@calis.blacksun.org) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 10:03:08 -0500 (EST) From: Don To: rittle@rsch.comm.mot.com Cc: talbotn@sportsmedicine.com.au, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG, dfr@nlsystems.com Subject: Re: 3.1 RELEASE In-Reply-To: <199903252237.QAA22350@supra.rsch.comm.mot.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > i need a stable version [of FreeBSD/alpha]. is there such a beast or > > am i chasing my tail. Well I have been running 4.0 on an older Alpha 233 and have not had any problems with stability. It has only been a few weeks now but it is serving as a name server and I routinely use it for other tasks. Other than a small fiasco when I tried to install the 3.1-stable release of the Alpha distribution (and the install disks needed to be told what ftp server to use) the port has been generally very reliable. -Don To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message