Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:30:33 +0200
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: something had broken in *.mk?
Message-ID:  <20121017123033.GE27385@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <20121017142538.415e9398@bsd64.grem.de>
References:  <507E6578.7070604@yandex.ru> <507E8E03.5040404@marino.st> <507E8F6A.4080903@yandex.ru> <20121017115536.GC27385@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20121017122044.GD27385@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20121017142538.415e9398@bsd64.grem.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--5xSkJheCpeK0RUEJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:25:38PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:20:45 +0200
> Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>=20
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:55:37PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:58:50PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> > > > John Marino wrote on 17.10.2012 14:52:
> > > > > You're building with bmake and not make.
> > > > > bmake uses :tu and :tl where make uses :U and :L, among other
> > > > > things. It's the :L modifier that's causing your errors.
> > > > > use the FreeBSD version of make instead.
> > > > > John
> > > >=20
> > > > Yes, you are right. I just remember that I decided to check
> > > > WITH_BMAKE. Just rebuild usr.bin/make without this knob and
> > > > everything now ok. Thanks.
> > > >=20
> > > > --=20
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Ruslan
> > > >=20
> > > > Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> > > > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> > >=20
> > > We will be able to switch the ports tree to bmake after 9.0 and 8.2
> > > are EOLed
> > >=20
> > > regards,
> > > Bapt
> >=20
> >=20
> > I meant 8.3 and 9.0 sorry
> > regards,
> > Bapt
>=20
> Is there any background information about this planned switch to bmake
> (beyond http://wiki.freebsd.org/201110DevSummit/bmake).
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Michael Gmelin

I don't know much about this, I just know that current is going to use bmak=
e,
and the only incompatibility I have spotted so far from our make to bmake i=
s the
:L becoming :tl and :U becoming :tu

Once 8.3 and 9.0 are EOLed all version of freebsd make support both syntax,=
 so
the ports could safely use both bmake and make (once we change in the ports=
 tree
all the :U and :L occurence.)

which means everything should just continue working ootb for everyone on
supported version of FreeBSD :)

regards,
Bapt

--5xSkJheCpeK0RUEJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlB+pOkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ex9DACglGjHPheTSMxIN7QAtYbxcqDW
3scAn3tUvBxb//UPXa6g/umC0hQwgUQD
=GQTp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5xSkJheCpeK0RUEJ--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121017123033.GE27385>