Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:11:36 +0100 From: Berislav Purgar <bpurgar@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_ath_tx - svn r226797 Message-ID: <CAAUsrB4gmjgWGvsJegcj%2BN5a88csYQWk0J-UHd=Wkvi6frmBHQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmons2%2BF%2Bbqj6UXwJp49GTPv9KeyX_v_8YGToL6T-_-zLsw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAAUsrB7n7eu=jvFsJZ=G=V3EzoeMGAKS3Xe5r=WXp70WnbpnRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=RT1kr%2BjNSi%2BPtBBC54e5CAcfjVoNamxwQxww5EXg%2BcQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmons2%2BF%2Bbqj6UXwJp49GTPv9KeyX_v_8YGToL6T-_-zLsw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hey, you're right - r225601 on my AR9220 in _congested_ 2.4ghz space > works a lot better. > I'm still getting stuck beacons, but nowhere near as many as before. > > I'm getting like 10,000-15,000 PHY errors a second though, so the NIC > is very much in interference city. > What's annoying is that an AR9160 _right next to it_ is not acting up at > all. > > Ok, I'll go digging later on to see what the story is. What's > unfortunate is this is the first time I've really seen it and it's > whilst sitting 12 storeys up in a hotel in Sydney.. this makes it > rather difficult to reproduce. :) > > > > Adrian > Same situation on me .. next to 9280 is 5212 and 5213 and i don't have any problems with these cards and stuck beacon errors. I'm still trying to find best rev for 9280 to work but for now 225601 is the best (only on 20MHz channel width / 40MHz is same like other revs . much more stuck beacon and BB hangs error) Beri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAAUsrB4gmjgWGvsJegcj%2BN5a88csYQWk0J-UHd=Wkvi6frmBHQ>