From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Feb 6 17:39:01 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA02432 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 17:39:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from hda.hda.com (hda.com [199.232.40.182]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA02424 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 17:38:57 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dufault@localhost) by hda.hda.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA23772; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 20:42:38 -0500 From: Peter Dufault Message-Id: <199602070142.UAA23772@hda.hda.com> Subject: Re: Can FreeBSD be used in a commercial way? To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 20:42:37 -0500 (EST) Cc: ian_stewart@nyro.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199602062038.NAA03259@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Feb 6, 96 01:38:15 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk (Terry's opinion...) > Anyone else: feel free to correct me if you interpret the distribution > terms differently. This summary looks good to me, Terry, and matches my opinion. Something like this should go on the web page if it isn't there already. I've noticed some of the other follow ups are a little discouraging. This is a commercial - friendly OS and commercial ventures should be encouraged. And we don't have any of that "you can only sell your services" GPL baggage. What are the rules about the FreeBSD name? Jordan, do you have a summary? -- Peter Dufault Real-Time Machine Control and Simulation HD Associates, Inc. Voice: 508 433 6936 dufault@hda.com Fax: 508 433 5267