From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 26 11:45:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE932A45; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 11:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3893118DC; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 11:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id a1so7253982wgh.35 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 03:45:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=UaVq4dd1REdDvWImvnDbAQHxVHtqc9zR+ATT+0SGZwk=; b=K2VFZHiy+XysBkTI1uDgx1/M21VyB0A84YpdgHi9zQh+pPRjS+GERDw7qlQfgLMIUE fFmwDrTGjNvB0/82mOqjXoPmgIYKtC9INhhlODSoAJv6qDqJWlhOC/r7tCPRoNOUknEM y7AceF3p04QWG2AbD6f9b2NKR4uK0O+6aFrYjyvpboaiRgpapVZNNByNM8JfMRabnZGa zgn2wz8GaQvjOtzgPLhPE6UnZtHwb2F66dccDbH4DCyvyy00oUcf2IowKBL7AjXP97je jClY0INeNfF9K1Qy6S+mWOUuZg7+sASfao6CMU2tlJKSJ8Mir5qx2lC8hvU/PZ8Wg6jA d5Dg== X-Received: by 10.180.206.41 with SMTP id ll9mr28703949wic.7.1388058315482; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 03:45:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ithaqua.etoilebsd.net (ithaqua.etoilebsd.net. [37.59.37.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id at5sm33266424wic.1.2013.12.26.03.45.14 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Dec 2013 03:45:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:45:12 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: clutton Subject: Re: shells/bash-static fails to package/deinstall cleanly Message-ID: <20131226114512.GI40122@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <52BBC768.6010702@dougbarton.us> <1388043634.3771.31.camel@eva02.mbsd> <52BBE04D.4060708@dougbarton.us> <1388046987.3771.36.camel@eva02.mbsd> <1388051565.3771.59.camel@eva02.mbsd> <1388054443.3771.66.camel@eva02.mbsd> <52BC0A18.1080503@FreeBSD.org> <1388057262.3771.78.camel@eva02.mbsd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h22Fi9ANawrtbNPX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1388057262.3771.78.camel@eva02.mbsd> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 11:45:18 -0000 --h22Fi9ANawrtbNPX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 01:27:42PM +0200, clutton wrote: > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:51 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 26/12/2013 10:40, clutton wrote: > > > The whole port because of STATIC option? > > > It'll be better to move this thing to bash port and make it as an > > > option. Like zsh maintainer did. > >=20 > > It's already an option in the bash port. > >=20 > > You seem somewhat unclear on the concept of slave ports and why they > > should exist. The point here is so that users of binary packages can > > jut type > >=20 > > pkg install bash-static > >=20 > > and get a statically linked version of bash. This is the principal > > reason that slave ports exist: so that the same software will be built > > with different sets of default options, either for end user convenience > > or because some other port depends on having some specific combination > > of options. > >=20 > > Cheers, > >=20 > > Matthew > >=20 >=20 > I know why, I mean I understand the purpose. >=20 > http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-ports@freebsd.org/msg52457.html >=20 > I thought that after OPTIONS framework was introduced all -x11 and > similar ports are legacy. Am I wrong? >=20 Not yet the OPTIONS framework is just the first step, the second step is ki= lling pkg_install and the last step bringing in subpackages/flavours :) regards, Bapt --h22Fi9ANawrtbNPX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlK8FsgACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExT/QCfVS5WJRxtSmRh01m8COz6vxcf EYEAoJxDyegtLBTP9TwCYXHJUDHoyGu7 =GZnM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h22Fi9ANawrtbNPX--