From owner-freebsd-bugbusters Wed Feb 19 14:24:32 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7F937B401; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 14:24:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailsrv.otenet.gr (mailsrv.otenet.gr [195.170.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3517A43F3F; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 14:24:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-b201.otenet.gr [212.205.244.209]) by mailsrv.otenet.gr (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1JMOQFw001926; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 00:24:27 +0200 (EET) Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h1JMOP0R006205; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 00:24:25 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h1JMOP17006204; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 00:24:25 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 00:24:25 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Tilman Linneweh Cc: bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PRs assigned to people without freefall account. Message-ID: <20030219222425.GB615@gothmog.gr> References: <20030219175809.60befbe1.arved@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030219175809.60befbe1.arved@FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2003-02-19 17:58, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > Hi bugbusters, > > I am wondering if there is a policy about assigning PRs to people > without freefall accounts. > > There are some in the PR Database most sent by MA, Dunzi > , who prefills the Responsible: field with > the port Maintainer. There is only one non-ports PR that has a reesponsible field with a non freebsd.org address, and this has been closed a rather long while ago. Now, only ports-PRs are in gnats with this sort of reponsible: > For example: > ports/48392 > ports/48387 > ports/48330 I think that this is probably OK for ports stuff, since the maintainer is probably the first person who should take care of problems with the specific ports. But what happens if the maintainer has lost that email address, or cannot work on the ports anymore? Prefilling the responsible field is certainly *not* okay for the rest of the categories, since this way committers might never have a chance of looking at the PR in question and noticing that there is a problem. > But I have also seen some committers assign PRs to the port > Maintainers, e.g ports/48363. This is fine imho, as long as the maintainer has expressed a wish to resolve all the possible problems of the port; this *is* what maintainership is all about, after all, right? The only really important reservation that I have against this is: how will the maintainer of a port that is not committer find someone to really do the commit and close the PR for him? I'm not a ports committer, so perhaps the freebsd-ports people can help here? > IMHO all PRs should be assigned to people who are able to close the PRs. Seems reasonable too. > What do you think? Should an explaining paragraph be added to the PR > handling guidelines? What do the ports committers prefer? a) Letting the responsible field contain non-committer emails? b) Only allowing FreeBSD.org addresses. - - Giorgos -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+VAQZ1g+UGjGGA7YRAlxSAJ0Y5DaweNkALDjpwgab7xCX/RiraQCgkwWw PcJqYkB4KGOtZfjnLqq1upA= =R5eZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugbusters" in the body of the message