From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Apr 3 5: 6:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from iquest3.iquest.net (iquest3.iquest.net [209.43.20.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECA3614C85 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 1999 05:06:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toor@y.dyson.net) Received: (qmail 4347 invoked from network); 3 Apr 1999 13:04:18 -0000 Received: from dyson.iquest.net (HELO y.dyson.net) (198.70.144.127) by iquest3.iquest.net with SMTP; 3 Apr 1999 13:04:18 -0000 Received: (from toor@localhost) by y.dyson.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) id IAA45765; Sat, 3 Apr 1999 08:04:16 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199904031304.IAA45765@y.dyson.net> Subject: Re: Speaking of advocacy tasks... In-Reply-To: <19990403111901.A28453@cons.org> from Martin Cracauer at "Apr 3, 99 11:19:02 am" To: cracauer@cons.org (Martin Cracauer) Date: Sat, 3 Apr 1999 08:04:16 -0500 (EST) Cc: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG From: "John S. Dyson" Reply-To: dyson@iquest.net X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Martin Cracauer said: > In <14473.923094280@zippy.cdrom.com>, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > The very first thing a new user typically visits when they come to our > > site for the first time is this: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/features.html > > > > And somehow, I don't think "bounce buffers" really rates as one of our > > top features at this point. This text is so stale as to be almost > > counter-productive in some ways. Any takers? > Bounce buffers are an anti-feature now :-). -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@iquest.net | it makes one look stupid jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message