Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:10:49 -0500
From:      Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>
To:        Randall Stewart <rstewart@adaranetworks.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Subject:   Re: TCP question: Is this simultaneous close handling broken?
Message-ID:  <CAF6rxgk2W04grtzOu3=d_wYRNRCS4oVYh0edU0CC-BHreDzj_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <417C5F59-DD48-4BEC-BD28-BFF87B8F61E3@adaranetworks.com>
References:  <52CB3AE9.3030107@wemm.org> <52CC5F2E.5030201@wemm.org> <52CC8246.7080609@wemm.org> <52CC903C.5090706@sentex.net> <52CCC0DF.1020007@wemm.org> <52CDA490.5060002@wemm.org> <417C5F59-DD48-4BEC-BD28-BFF87B8F61E3@adaranetworks.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Randall Stewart
<rstewart@adaranetworks.com> wrote:
...

Hi all,

This email thread occurred when I was on vacation.  Since then there
were a variety of commits to the relevant code (all the way back to
stable/4!).  Is this still an issue?


-- 
Eitan Adler
Source, Ports, Doc committer
Bugmeister, Ports Security teams



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgk2W04grtzOu3=d_wYRNRCS4oVYh0edU0CC-BHreDzj_g>