From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 3 19:11:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4553F2EC for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22a.google.com (mail-qc0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF0D219EC for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id e9so11960877qcy.15 for ; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:11:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZR3U/b2kHiAbMY5vCv+VQeY6L3nK+Q6h4thzkeS0LpI=; b=Jq+Fac9B9xGNrYRpVtb4zxoQEKuoYk6WavcuEUtbXkscJlvwRLYJp9SLyZM2+t+YLk pa89ZKMgcd3LAptFx9n6wn8UmWyrmDV2gRqAlH0tdgO5EwjHgSR8HulHreaClmScYE6T gW3kLf2Sm1XzdgzJ/BjP4ufaldViDRly1OSNg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZR3U/b2kHiAbMY5vCv+VQeY6L3nK+Q6h4thzkeS0LpI=; b=LB31KIG4dUWhirXODo4mT105b3Hg41gBsvBCNU1BSOq8BrPg+RhU7r5G2SeglikQaa UFTOwl09FMlGLX/j2sXXJbKDk4utd3himzGJs+RpFMdcAvM9Xca4y7/THNMLFAXEWaqO Mo8mWcbMEbVD0qtDK8jMN+Fe7FMUjBbaYpWBujizHFI1Faks9Rz2Wiz7Ev5DFQX6m/6F 9V08d3Mpes/1olhEH7ppGfkL5uZiKe6O3clGvYoW3rB0f7Zxr8hOBXbTRIwF4Vh2Fnh3 PfA81pKpp/hDk80sd4N77fNRQT5cBKiFL2HTS6rpfnrNP6z8zZ2yxyWW+C7bPyXw+OIq VERg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmVb8Bb2NN7E2CgXBE5QdXzM+P5MjMHN7WLefhgRC4t7tAKCFpvIpcwCXCIY5IL5rslbxXf X-Received: by 10.229.213.194 with SMTP id gx2mr58741732qcb.16.1391454679113; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:11:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lists@eitanadler.com Received: by 10.96.30.229 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:10:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <417C5F59-DD48-4BEC-BD28-BFF87B8F61E3@adaranetworks.com> References: <52CB3AE9.3030107@wemm.org> <52CC5F2E.5030201@wemm.org> <52CC8246.7080609@wemm.org> <52CC903C.5090706@sentex.net> <52CCC0DF.1020007@wemm.org> <52CDA490.5060002@wemm.org> <417C5F59-DD48-4BEC-BD28-BFF87B8F61E3@adaranetworks.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:10:49 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: QA68qrxu449Jcc_nZs3sEbvFj5E Message-ID: Subject: Re: TCP question: Is this simultaneous close handling broken? To: Randall Stewart Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-net , Peter Wemm , Mike Tancsa X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 19:11:20 -0000 On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Randall Stewart wrote: ... Hi all, This email thread occurred when I was on vacation. Since then there were a variety of commits to the relevant code (all the way back to stable/4!). Is this still an issue? -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams