Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:36:13 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: Clayton Milos <clay@milos.co.za>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, ke han <ke.han@redstarling.com> Subject: Re: em driver testing Message-ID: <200611072336.kA7NaD3f008609@lava.sentex.ca> In-Reply-To: <45510033.7010102@samsco.org> References: <68011C68-0962-4946-88E1-F36EE7C707DA@redstarling.com> <20061106221219.GA66676@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <041201c701f9$37b2aed0$9603a8c0@claylaptop> <2a41acea0611061614n478efe77y82c0ebc2e1b01e19@mail.gmail.com> <001601c702af$9d355940$9603a8c0@claylaptop> <2a41acea0611071304n4fae1751ic462a58b45825bf2@mail.gmail.com> <45510033.7010102@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 04:52 PM 11/7/2006, Scott Long wrote:
>I think it's more that the if_em driver watchdog was insulating the
>if_xl driver. Once the if_em component was removed, the if_xl driver
>was the next in line to be a victim. So yes, like you say, all of the
>drivers need to be fixed.
I wonder if thats what the issue I was seeing on the rl interface.
While trying to stress test an em based machine, I saw
Nov 6 17:33:05 releng6-865 kernel: rl0: watchdog timeout
while blasting out UDP traffic via netrate from the rl based box to
the em based box.
---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200611072336.kA7NaD3f008609>