From owner-freebsd-security Sun Dec 10 20:55:31 2000 From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 20:55:30 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [207.154.226.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D5837B400 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:55:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1098) id 47E962B28F; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:55:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:55:29 -0600 From: Bill Fumerola To: Daniel Hauer Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MAC Address Message-ID: <20001210225529.N86825@elvis.mu.org> References: <3A3457AA.7507D386@enter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A3457AA.7507D386@enter.net>; from dh@enter.net on Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 11:27:22PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-FEARSOME-20001103 i386 Sender: billf@elvis.mu.org Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 11:27:22PM -0500, Daniel Hauer wrote: > Sounds to me all this is just_slightly_unethical_if > _not_bordering_on_illegal. This is a topic for a security mailing list? > I thought we were here to boost network security, not circumvent it. > Just a network technician's opinion. Most of the time discussions on how to circumvent security result in better ways to boost it. -- Bill Fumerola - security yahoo / Yahoo! inc. - fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message