From owner-freebsd-current Sun Oct 1 10:51:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108B737B502; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 10:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA00612; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:51:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id LAA00911; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:51:13 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010011751.LAA00911@harmony.village.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: setting device permissions for DEVFS Cc: Jeremy Lea , Mike Meyer , Alexander Langer , current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2000 22:03:57 +0200." <11056.970344237@critter> References: <11056.970344237@critter> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 11:51:13 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <11056.970344237@critter> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : We need a generic "devd" which finds out that devices have appeared, : set their perms (if needed/wanted) and executes any commands needed : (getty, mount, etc etc) by the device. ifconfig and dhclient are likely the most often executed ones now. I agree we need a generic devd. Does devfs use the kqueue interface? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message