Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 09:54:31 +0200 From: Willie Viljoen <will@unfoldings.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kde3 on 300mhz / make package Message-ID: <200302080954.31329.will@unfoldings.net> In-Reply-To: <1044684066.35995.22.camel@localhost> References: <20030207225459.31402381.fbsdq@kuyarov.org> <1044684066.35995.22.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 08 February 2003 08:01, Andr=E9 Ramos wrote: > On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 05:54, Peter wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a 300mhz, 128MB Ram pc standing here, and I'm thinking of > > installing kde3 on there, does anyone know if that will be an alright > > combination or would that be very slow / not worth it? I have an > > athlon 1800+, can I just remove my /etc/make.conf file, and do a "make > > package" on here to build kde3 and later install it on the 300mhz pc?=20 > > As I'm planning to do a make package for kde 3.1, is that all that's > > needed to make a package that could go on > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/x11 ? If so I'd like > > to start making some packages on this lazy 1800+. > > > > > > ---Peter--- > > > > -------------- > > It is now 10 p.m. Do you know where Henry Kissinger is? > > -- Elizabeth Carpenter > > > > ---FreeBSD The Power To Serve--- > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > I personally wouldn't run KDE3 on a 300Mhz machine, well I wouldn't run > on any machine, but on that one it just might get too heavy and slow. I disagree. I run KDE 3.1 with all of the bells and wistles turned on on a= =20 Celeron 333, performance compares favourably to Windows XP running on a=20 coworker's Duron 1300. All I would do before I set that up is to add some=20 RAM to that system. The Celeron 333 based system I use to run KDE 3.1 has=20 320MB of RAM, and I am even considering an upgrade to 512MB. KDE, ever=20 since 3.0, has been very RAM heavy, I wouldn't run it if I didn't have=20 atleast 256MB RAM. With *EVERYTHING* nifty turned off, ie, making it look like Windows 95, I=20 have seen 3.0.3 run on systems with Pentium 150 processors with 32MB of=20 RAM, it's not pretty though and it takes about 5 seconds for any menu to=20 pop up, 5 seconds too long. If you find a "half-way" between this, it=20 should work nicely with 128MB, but than it would basically look and run=20 like KDE 2, and it wouldn't be worth the effort, IMHO. Will > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message =2D-=20 Willie Viljoen =46reelance IT Consultant 214 Paul Kruger Avenue, Universitas Bloemfontein 9321 South Africa +27 51 522 15 60 +27 51 522 44 36 (after hours) +27 82 404 03 27 (mobile) will@unfoldings.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302080954.31329.will>