Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:14:42 -0500 From: Technical Information <tech_info@threespace.com> To: FreeBSD Chat <chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why dual boot? Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20020125170720.01922970@threespace.com> In-Reply-To: <3C51CD33.4E69B204@mindspring.com> References: <3C4FBE5C.2AE8C65@mindspring.com> <20020123114658.A514@lpt.ens.fr> <20020123223104.SM01952@there> <3C4FBE5C.2AE8C65@mindspring.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20020124213809.00e6e5d0@localhost> <20020125131659.GB7374@hades.hell.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 04:25 PM 1/25/2002, Terry Lambert wrote: >Requiring Windows XP to include a repartitioning facility; >they already have the defragger code, and the partitioning >code (the former is there in the disk properties, the latter >in the installation) to take the fear out of it. Then you'd have companies like PowerQuest crying foul when they couldn't sell you Partition Magic 7.0 for $70 a pop. --Chip Morton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20020125170720.01922970>