Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:09:09 +0200 From: clemens fischer <ino-news@spotteswoode.dnsalias.org> To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: JTAG recommendations? Message-ID: <5ksdk4xsa3.ln2@nntp.spotteswoode.dnsalias.org> References: <20070611214113.GC44552@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <200706120921.09263.freebsd-embedded@dino.sk> <20070612083825.GA56032@tirith.brixandersen.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Henrik Brix Andersen in <20070612083825.GA56032@tirith.brixandersen.dk>: > That's not the issue here - I was asking what other people on FreeBSD > use for their JTAG needs, seeing that OpenOCD isn't in ports I doubt > that is in widespread use among FreeBSD users (else, someone would > have submitted a port). well, i actually use the openOCD software with a wiggler. there's a small patch needed re. port-IO, which i can send you. the original is based on linux-only, which has port and value reversed, and fbsd needs different includes. Dominic Rath keeps forgetting about us, although i had sent him the patch. i think he wants something more generic than a simple "#ifdef __FreeBSD__ ... #endif" scheme. you should use the version from the SVN repo. as is state-of-the-art with fbsd, you'd have to use the right auto* version numbers for the bootstrapping. ohhh... i just noticed "svn update" won't do with my old sources. this means i'll have to checkout the entire tree again. no time for that now. regards, clemens
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5ksdk4xsa3.ln2>