Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Dec 2001 09:19:09 -0800
From:      Joe Kelsey <joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us>
To:        "Daniel M. Eischen" <eischen@vigrid.com>
Cc:        Joe Kelsey <joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us>, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: JNI, -pthread vs -lc_r
Message-ID:  <15400.46349.742715.796089@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us>
In-Reply-To: <3C27E51C.8FAA054E@vigrid.com>
References:  <200112232058.VAA10405@www.blender.nl> <15399.37685.556086.133776@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> <3C27E51C.8FAA054E@vigrid.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel M. Eischen writes:
 > Well, since I unwove it about a year ago (in -current), I think it
 > _can_ be unwoven ;-)  libc and libc_r are separate entities and you
 > can now link an application to both with -lc_r.  It isn't that way
 > in -stable because it would necessitate a library version bump and
 > probably cause too much breakage.

I am glad to hear that, as it is a concern for Java.  Unfortunately, we
will not be able to take advantage of it...

/Joe

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15400.46349.742715.796089>