From owner-freebsd-java Tue Dec 25 9:16:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from zircon.seattle.wa.us (sense-sea-CovadSub-0-228.oz.net [216.39.147.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8488D37B419 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 09:16:35 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 14761 invoked by uid 1001); 25 Dec 2001 17:19:09 -0000 From: Joe Kelsey MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15400.46349.742715.796089@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 09:19:09 -0800 To: "Daniel M. Eischen" Cc: Joe Kelsey , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: JNI, -pthread vs -lc_r In-Reply-To: <3C27E51C.8FAA054E@vigrid.com> References: <200112232058.VAA10405@www.blender.nl> <15399.37685.556086.133776@zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us> <3C27E51C.8FAA054E@vigrid.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.98 under Emacs 21.1.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Daniel M. Eischen writes: > Well, since I unwove it about a year ago (in -current), I think it > _can_ be unwoven ;-) libc and libc_r are separate entities and you > can now link an application to both with -lc_r. It isn't that way > in -stable because it would necessitate a library version bump and > probably cause too much breakage. I am glad to hear that, as it is a concern for Java. Unfortunately, we will not be able to take advantage of it... /Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message