Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:32:36 +0100
From:      Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
To:        Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Port system "problems"
Message-ID:  <4FE9E424.4090005@infracaninophile.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4FE9DC87.5060205@netfence.it>
References:  <4FE8E4A4.9070507@gmail.com> <20120626065732.GH41054@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120626092645.Horde.HytQbVNNcXdP6WQ1aMtjoMA@webmail.df.eu> <4FE96BA0.6040005@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4FE97008.2060501@netfence.it> <4FE97AE1.9080109@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4FE9817C.7020905@netfence.it> <4FE99200.7050107@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4FE9DC87.5060205@netfence.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigE5A19D27A5AB49B964E0B70C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 26/06/2012 17:00, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> I'm not sure I undestood correctly (from this and other posts); please
> correct me if I'm wrong:
> _ the whole thing is aimed at packages; I won't be able to install port=
s
> directly, but I'll get an intermediate step that creates packages
> automatically;
> _ in the PHP example, I will create lots of subpackages, but I will
> eventually install only some;
> _ I can keep the packages somewhere, so I can install them later.

Yes: essentially, the ports tree is used to build packages and those
packages are what are installed.  OpenBSD ports has worked this way for
many years.

> Well, if I'm correct, the above will be a no go for me: lots of my
> customer's servers are tight on disk space and they won't spend for new=

> storage. So this will mean I won't be able to use ports anymore and I'l=
l
> need to download packages directly?

If you have many systems to maintain, then pkgng should help by making
it much easier for you to create an off-line package building system and
associated repository.  You won't necessarily have to have a ports tree
on your customer systems at all, and you won't need to take up space on
your customer systems installing any build dependencies there.

Both poudriere and tinderbox-devel support creating pkgng package
repositories, if you want a management system for your build-box.

	Cheers,

	Matthew


--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                   7 Priory Courtyard
                                                  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey     Ramsgate
JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk               Kent, CT11 9PW




--------------enigE5A19D27A5AB49B964E0B70C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/p5CsACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxU4wCgk+K4y/18XQVHfEnDiYq0tj/b
RJ8AnRhwb7Dj5axSWsmp6xhFtR0RukqC
=J7Xs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigE5A19D27A5AB49B964E0B70C--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FE9E424.4090005>