Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 12:58:40 -0700 From: Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sup-ing stable Message-ID: <199608161958.MAA28130@kachina.jetcafe.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> You sure it doesn't say something like: FreeBSD SkyRsh.aac.dev.com > 2.1-STABLE FreeBSD 2.1-STABLE #0: Sun Aug 11 12:46:13 PDT 1996 > root@SkyRsh.aac.dev.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/SKYRSH i386 Sure. But here's two machines I have loaded this on to: FreeBSD avalon.jetcafe.org 2.1-STABLE FreeBSD 2.1-STABLE #0: Sun Aug 11 23:12:32 1996 dave@avalon.jetcafe.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/AVALON i386 FreeBSD elxr.jetcafe.org 2.1.5-RELEASE FreeBSD 2.1.5-RELEASE #0: Mon Jul 29 05:01:05 PDT 1996 dave@elxr.jetcafe.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/ELXR i386 Note the time differences, those are approximately when I sup'd the distributions. > Note, 2.1-STABLE, not 2.1-RELEASE. I know. However, I agree with this 100%: > I think there is enough confusion out there that the strings should be > changed to this: > TYPE="FreeBSD" > REVISION="2.1.5" > BRANCH="STABLE" Also... > It's still the ``STABLE'' branch, but PAST the 2.1.5 release tag... > ``STABLE'' == the cvs RELENG_2_1_0 tag, so I don't want to here the > cvs tag confustion again please... Are people still patching this tree? I thought you guys wanted to freeze this code. ------ Dave Hayes - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org Freedom Knight of Usenet - http://www.jetcafe.org/~dave/usenet The practice of study only too often makes people mere repeaters and producers of cliches and sayings. Such study has been all but wasted. The product has taken the form in which we find it because it is an unsuitable graft upon an unprepared basis.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608161958.MAA28130>