Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:39:29 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>, Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> Cc: audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: printjob.c mktemp() problem Message-ID: <v0421010ab61ba29330ec@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20001024211518.E209@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <20001024140510.G93799@lucifer.bart.nl> <20001024170054.Q93799@lucifer.bart.nl> <20001024192539.A65599@gvr.gvr.org> <20001024202942.C209@lucifer.bart.nl> <20001024211518.E209@lucifer.bart.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 9:15 PM +0200 10/24/00, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > >I still need to look at Garance's mention of the tempfile name which > >doesn't include a /tmp/ path. > >My new patch should also fix this case. > >Given that lpd is a daemon I didn't use warnx/errx but instead used >syslog(), but it might be that some logging is not yet fully clear what >went wrong with my patch. I'll try to test that tomorrow. > >I haven't sanitized the code further except make my changes as sane >possible as I could by myself and guidance from my mentors and peers. Oops, I didn't notice your new patch was in the same message. The new patch is not good, because the temp files should not be in /tmp. It might be best to let this particular mktemp call alone for now, and I'll fix it when I get a chance to. I'd say more, but something odd seems to be going on in our (RPI) network right now... --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v0421010ab61ba29330ec>