From owner-freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 07:56:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC711065672 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:56:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [194.62.233.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C138FC0C for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from sp34.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.107] helo=bs1.sp34.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LCUmp-0008OZ-Oc; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:56:11 +0300 Received: from bsam by bs1.sp34.ru with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LCUmp-0000KR-Ig; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:56:11 +0300 To: ElBarto References: <60571528@bs1.sp34.ru> <01693389@bb.ipt.ru> <4946E27E.1050803@arcadebsd.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:56:11 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4946E27E.1050803@arcadebsd.org> (elbarto@arcadebsd.org's message of "Tue\, 16 Dec 2008 00\:04\:30 +0100") Message-ID: <49841540@bs1.sp34.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: binary mtree for openafs port(s) X-BeenThere: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Andrew File System and FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:56:13 -0000 ElBarto writes: > Boris Samorodov wrote: >> this is time to decide which mtree for binaries is apropriate >> for openafs port(s). That's my proposal: >> >> PREFIX=/usr/local >> BINDIR=$PREFIX/bin >> SBINDIR=$PREFIX/sbin >> >> SBINDIR: all *server + upclient BINDIR: all other binaries >> >> What do you think? Thanks! > > I'll prefer to have all the *server in $PREFIX/libexec/openafs like > the pkgsrc for netbsd. That makes sence. > As those binaries are not intend to be called manually it seems normal > to not have them > in /usr/local/bin or /usr/local/sbin. > Just look at the pkgsrc, I kind of like the way it is done. This package contains the whole distribution. This is just what we do have now, but ee are going to separate server and client files. How can we do it? WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve