From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep  4 05:24:49 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1FEFC1;
 Wed,  4 Sep 2013 05:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlh@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from caravan.chchile.org (caravan.chchile.org [178.32.125.136])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C33F32E6C;
 Wed,  4 Sep 2013 05:24:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by caravan.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id EAEB2C0A95; Wed,  4 Sep 2013 05:24:46 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 07:24:46 +0200
From: Jeremie Le Hen <jlh@FreeBSD.org>
To: Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com>, Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>,
 FreeBSD SCSI <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>,
 freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org,
 "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][CFT] GEOM direct dispatch and fine-grained CAM locking
Message-ID: <20130904052446.GD43281@caravan.chchile.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com>,
 Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>,
 FreeBSD SCSI <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>,
 freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org,
 "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
References: <520D4ADB.50209@FreeBSD.org> <5224511D.4090503@FreeBSD.org>
 <20130903134251.GB43281@caravan.chchile.org>
 <CAKYr3zwjQ9K1c5smZXTESa3T5UnchYaipYQCS2OAJOUFyPBGww@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130903212426.GC43281@caravan.chchile.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130903212426.GC43281@caravan.chchile.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SCSI subsystem <freebsd-scsi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-scsi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
 <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 05:24:49 -0000

On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:24:26PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:10:32PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jeremie Le Hen <jlh@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
> > > > improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
> > > > see developing in project/camlock SVN branch. Full diff of that branch
> > > > against present head (r255131) can be found here:
> > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/camlock_patches/camlock_20130902.patch
> > >
> > > I'm building my kernel right now.
> > >
> > >
> > Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
> > theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to
> > help further it.
> > Just checking to see how widely its been tested,
> 
> Very stable so far.  I'm doing a make -j 4 buildworld in parallel of a
> periodic security run.  This has been running for hours without failure.

FWIW, I have 4 drives total, distributed in 2 zpool containing 2
mirrored zdev each.

-- 
Jeremie Le Hen

Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
They forgot to mention Morons.