Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 12:33:40 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RFC: Fate of /usr/share/doc/smm/10.named Message-ID: <20020701093340.GB98731@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <3D1FFA5A.80B22BB6@FreeBSD.org> References: <3D1FFA5A.80B22BB6@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 11:44:42PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > I did the bind 8.3.3 import today, and nuked the doc/bog (BIND > Operator's Guide) directory because I couldn't find anywhere in the tree > where it was used. Well, I didn't look hard enough, because it was there > in /usr/src/share/doc/smm/10.named. The other reason I felt confident > removing it was that it's quite old, dating back to 1994-6, and > referencing BIND 4.=20 >=20 > To fix the build, I removed 10.named from the smm/Makefile temporarily. > I'd like to permanently remove it, since IMO it's no longer pertinent. > Opinions? >=20 The best we can do is to try to figure out whether BIND developers are going to update or nuke it, and act appropriately. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9ICH0Ukv4P6juNwoRAuplAJ0etVi7Li7nmwua2Ad/0DYhaJ5FqwCfXcYI WhMwDRpUD273UZ6h55SKzps= =xv76 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020701093340.GB98731>