Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:56:45 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64 slower than i386 on identical AMD 64 system? Message-ID: <44188D9D.8010801@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <20060315211307.GA88339@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200603140740.38388.joao@matik.com.br> <200603151728.35620.joao@matik.com.br> <20060315203922.GA87806@xor.obsecurity.org> <200603151754.27250.joao@matik.com.br> <20060315211307.GA88339@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > No, you haven't ruled it out, only that none of the versions you tried > fix your issue. Note what I said earlier: other people use dual core > CPUs on FreeBSD/amd64 without stability problems, so it is not a > general problem with FreeBSD. > Indeed, they are. The system below is working just fine for me, and the performance is quite good too (for a pentium4). It's a Supermicro PDSMi board: 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar 7 12:24:51 EST 2006 amd64 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2793.02-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf62 Stepping = 2 Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> Features2=0xe43d<SSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,VMX,CNTX-ID,CX16,<b14>,<b15>> AMD Features=0x20100800<SYSCALL,NX,LM> Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 535691264 (510 MB) avail memory = 510017536 (486 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44188D9D.8010801>