From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jan 16 6:23:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.189]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 923D837B404 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 06:23:37 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 8138 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Jan 2001 14:22:19 -0000 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:22:19 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: no newgroup/newgrp in FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20010116162219.I364@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: arch@FreeBSD.org References: <20010116161703.H364@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010116161703.H364@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from roam@orbitel.bg on Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 04:17:03PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 04:17:03PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Heyas, > > Is there a reason there is no newgroup/newgrp(1) in FreeBSD, besides > the fact that the kernel can support a simultaneous set of groups? > Still, it would be nice for compatibility (and SUSv2 compliance) > to have some kind of newgrp/newgroup implementation, albeit even > a null one. > > On http://ringwraith.online.bg/~roam/devel/c/sysutils/newgrp-1.0.tar.gz Uhm. Oops. Remove the c/ part. http://ringwraith.online.bg/~roam/devel/sysutils/newgrp-1.0.tar.gz Sorry, and thanks to Chris Faulhaber for pointing this out. G'luck, Peter -- Thit sentence is not self-referential because "thit" is not a word. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message