From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Wed Nov 7 10:15:14 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381331122C17; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 10:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF6948B477; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 10:15:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 8FC0CD5B4; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 10:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 10:15:13 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Koichiro Iwao Cc: Niclas Zeising , Baptiste Daroussin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r484357 - head/mail/spamassassin Message-ID: <20181107101513.GA81078@FreeBSD.org> References: <201811062146.wA6LknN3005274@repo.freebsd.org> <20181107083105.55o52urafcgdthec@ivaldir.net> <20181107091004.xbvzfyviyrkcbi2m@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20181107092211.dgcvichyunbss35x@ivaldir.net> <2b3670de-7625-d458-7c93-5ea0a7ae2af1@freebsd.org> <20181107095528.szgl6dytu7zuos5r@icepick.vmeta.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181107095528.szgl6dytu7zuos5r@icepick.vmeta.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: AF6948B477 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-106.68 / 200.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; ALLOW_DOMAIN_WHITELIST(-100.00)[freebsd.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; IP_SCORE(-3.57)[ip: (-9.35), ipnet: 96.47.64.0/20(-4.67), asn: 11403(-3.74), country: US(-0.09)]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx66.freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:96.47.64.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 10:15:14 -0000 On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 06:55:28PM +0900, Koichiro Iwao wrote: > ... > +1 to single port. I concern about not all people need that patch. Can > FLAVORS be used to create packages with/without Japanese patches? > I know it can be used to handle multiple versions of PHP, Python, etc. There's nothing wrong with a patch not being *useful* to all people, the question is would it break anything for anyone. If there are no undesired side effects just commit it without hiding it behind options or flavors. ./danfe