Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:39:27 +0400 From: Oleg Rusanov <freebsd-amd64@molecon.ru> To: freebsd-amd64 <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org> Subject: Mysql 4.1. my-large.cnf or my-medium.cnf? Dual Opteron web server 2gb memory Message-ID: <1812296880.20050730113927@molecon.ru>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello. my-large.cnf is twice quicklier, but the description from my-medium.cnf is approaches (such as a web server). It is necessary that Mysql worked twice more slowly on a web server? amd64# uname -r 5.4-STABLE make WITH_XCHARSET=all BUILD_OPTIMIZED=yes BUILD_STATIC=yes install --------------------------my-medium.cnf-------------------------------------- description: # This is for a system with little memory (32M - 64M) where MySQL plays # an important part, or systems up to 128M where MySQL is used together with # other programs (such as a web server) test: Query Barrel Report for client smacker1 connect: max=4ms min=2ms avg= 2ms from 10 clients Query_type num_queries max_time min_time q_per_s select_index 20000 0 0 11858.11 --------------------------/my-medium.cnf-------------------------------------- --------------------------my-large.cnf-------------------------------------- description: # This is for a large system with memory = 512M where the system runs mainly # MySQL. test: Query Barrel Report for client smacker1 connect: max=4ms min=2ms avg= 2ms from 10 clients Query_type num_queries max_time min_time q_per_s select_index 20000 0 0 21777.24 --------------------------/my-large.cnf-------------------------------------- -- Regards, Oleg Rusanov Molecon mailto:freebsd-amd64@molecon.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1812296880.20050730113927>