From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 27 21:53:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29746749 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 21:53:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F41EF8B for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 21:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Uh5MG-0004il-8M for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 May 2013 14:53:36 -0700 Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 14:53:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1369691616249-5815588.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <51A3CCF1.2080706@cran.org.uk> References: <1369665048044-5815448.post@n5.nabble.com> <1369679542074-5815520.post@n5.nabble.com> <20130528001340.393804429748c30d19c02ce3@gmail.com> <51A3CCF1.2080706@cran.org.uk> Subject: Re: Is latest portsnap snapshot corrupted? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 21:53:40 -0000 Indeed snapshot looks fixed, thanks for all replies! I don't use INDEX.db so should be fine without portsdb... -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Is-latest-portsnap-snapshot-corrupted-tp5815448p5815588.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.