Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 13:12:14 -0800 From: darklogik@pittgoth.com To: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: elderly anchors Message-ID: <3C1757AE.9904.90CE4C8@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20011212123254.A45773@blackhelicopters.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Such tags should go away! I honestly don't see a use for them other than pointing out where you are in a document blah blah blah, in essance I don't see a use. Correct my opinion if i'm wrong pls Tom Rhodes On 12 Dec 2001, at 12:32, Michael Lucas wrote: > At one point, we used anchor to point to particular sections in the > FAQ. Then some selfless non-committer put in a couple of PRs to add > question id= tags to each and every question in the blasted thing. > > In quite a few (not all!) cases, it appears that the anchor tags are > moot with that addition. > > <qandaentry> > <question id="dangerously-dedicated"> > <para>Will a <quote>dangerously dedicated</quote> disk endanger > my health?</para> > </question> > > <answer> > > <para><anchor id="dedicate">T > > Am I missing something, or should such tags go away? > > ==ml > > -- > Michael Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org > My FreeBSD column: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons > > http://www.blackhelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C1757AE.9904.90CE4C8>